Updated March 1, 2010
The top 4 objectives of the compensation plan are:
Create and maintain internal equity (fairness) among positions as measured by a defensible method of job evaluation.
Maintain the appropriate level of competitiveness with our relevant external markets.
Motivate the loyalty, retention, and contribution of all our employees.
Keep the administration of our salary plan objective, flexible and understandable.
The basic building blocks of the compensation plan are:
Use the Hay Job-Profile Method of Job Evaluation® to measure the size of all our jobs. This is an objective system that is the most widely used in the world.
Use evaluated job content to determine the internal ranking of all our positions. (The job is evaluated, not the person.)
Make annual comparisons to our relevant external markets to determine the proper positioning of our salary structures.
Perform an annual review of our structures, practices, and budgets in order to keep our program competitive and relevant to the changes in our state.
The range of pay rates, from minimum to maximum, set for a pay grade.
A salary and wage range in the pay plan prepared by the Hay Group and the Classification and Compensation Section.
The Market Policy Position is the position in the pay range that is the targeted level of base salary in the relevant comparator markets as defined in the State of Wyoming’s
Compensation philosophy that was adopted by the Legislature in 2009. This is the true market rate. The market includes both other State Governments and employers within Wyoming, both public and private sector.
The State is moving towards a pay for performance system that is based on market and performance. The two year movement to CMA was strictly a time-based policy which did not factor in the performance of an incumbent. Employees who excelled and employees who performed at a bare minimum were compensated the same rate simply based on time.
The gathering of data on wages and compensation paid by other employers for select key job classes or survey benchmarks.
During the Fall of 2008, market data was gathered using a number of sources:
Central States Compensation Association
Hay PayNet Data – this is proprietary salary information from the Hay Group
In-State Custom Survey
Wyoming Hospital Association Survey
Wyoming Prevailing Wage Survey for Contractors
The Market Policy Position or MPPA&I Human Resources Division Compensation Structure and Policy FAQ’s 03-01-10 Page 3.
Yes. We used Job Evaluation to create internal equity, and market survey data to create ranges.
It is anticipated a revised appraisal system will be developed prior to July 1, 2011.
Based on the market survey information that was gathered, certain occupational groups were paid consistently higher than the grade they were allocated to on the General Pay Table. Therefore, it was necessary to create a specific pay table for these occupational groups.
Based on an analysis of the market data, these jobs were paid higher than our scale so the Z’s were added to accommodate these positions.
The at-wills will have their own pay tables. One pay table will be created for the attorney positions and another for all other at-will positions; Directors, Deputy’s & Administrators.
No, not initially. In the compensation phase of this project employees will be moved to minimum. This will fix some of the inequities but may also create compression. We are aware that compression and internal equity will be an issue, however, due to the lack of funding, we are not able to address all of these concerns at this time. The new system of movement of pay based on market/performance will help us alleviate these issues.
A&I Human Resources Division will review the market data yearly and update the pay tables as needed based on analysis of the data.